Archive for the ‘Wireless Companies’ Category

What it Takes to Chokehold AT&T’s Network

December 17th, 2009 | 11:18 pm cdt

With Operation Chokehold just around the corner, I’ve been pondering Just how many users it takes to hose AT&T’s cellular data network. My guess: It could take as few as 550 concurrent users at one cell site.

AT&T Death Star

This is very unscientific, but using some educated guessing and some “solid” numbers from the internet, I’ve attempted to calculate just how weak AT&T’s network is when too many users try to use their phones for data purposes all at the same time.

Last month I attended the CMAs in downtown Nashville. From arriving about 40 minutes before the show started, until the crowd dispersed, AT&T’s data network was totally hosed. I had zero data access. It was abysmal. At one point I couldn’t even send text messages. I kept getting ‘Timeout’ errors.

So that got me thinking. Just how many people were concurrently trying to access the network that caused such a large interruption in service?

Luckily, being at the CMAs, we have some good numbers to start with. The Sommet center holds approximately 20,000 people in that particular configuration. Let’s add on another 5,000 people to include staff, and population immediately surrounding the affected cellular area (tourists, people working late, etc.).

Of 25,000 people, assuming each one has a cellular phone, AT&T commands around 30% of the market according to USA Today. That’s 7,500 of our 25,000. Now, how many of those customers have smart phones that would be more likely to access the data network? According to CNET, about 15% or 1,125 of our group of 7,500 AT&T customers.

From our number of 1,125 AT&T smart phone users, let’s be very generous and say half those people were all trying to use their phones at the exact same time. That number comes to 563 users accessing the data network all at the same time.

Does that number seem low? Well, I’ve written before about attending crowded events like Petit le Mans and Concours d’Elegance and experienced the same poor data performance. Something else to ponder: I had good data access during a Predators game at the same location with roughly the same size crowd. But, the big difference was the network access. At the CMAs you have thousands of people desperate to snap and share photos and text of A-list celebrities while at a hockey game, most people are focused on the game, not their phones.

AT∓T 1 bar EDGE

There are a lot of unknowns, still. How many “cell sites” service that downtown area of Nashville vs. an area like Road Atlanta and the rural beach of Florida. What’s really causing the network to stall? Is AT&T’s internet connection at their towers too narrow, or do they not have enough radio bandwidth to handle that number of phones concurrently?

Regardless of the choke point, AT&T has some work to do to get their network in order. Especially when you consider the high monthly price point they command. Hopefully Operation Chokehold will open AT&T’s eyes.


NY Times on AT&T Wireless Coverage Issues

September 8th, 2009 | 1:04 pm cdt

Last week the New York Times ran an article featuring AT&T’s wireless coverage problems. Several times I’ve written about the AT&T coverage problems experienced at my house.

The NY Times article basically blames the AT&T network. It’s just not robust enough to transfer larger amounts of data demanded by iPhone and other smartphone users. The release of the iPhone has largely exposed this vulnerability.

In my experience, at certain events where several thousand people are amassed all at once, AT&T data service becomes almost non-existent. I noticed this a couple times last year, once at the Petit Le Mans event near Atlanta, and again at the Concours d’Elegance near Jacksonville. Voice calls worked well, but data connections were not happening at all. So get a couple thousand people around a single AT&T cell tower, and you’ve got serious data fail.

It all seems to come down to bandwidth. With a lack of bandwidth it’s obvious why AT&T is delaying MMS and tethering options for the iPhone.

Although my issues at home are due to a weak signal, I’m still plagued by lack of a data connection and dropped calls.

Sucky AT&T coverage

It’s probably time for another call to AT&T customer service.


Sprint DOESN’T want You to Buy a Palm Pre

July 12th, 2009 | 8:06 pm cdt

I walked into the Sprint store in Smyrna this weekend to finally take a look at the new Palm Pre. Sprint had one on display, but they don’t want you to buy one. The phone on display wasn’t working. Maybe it wasn’t turned on. Maybe it was dead. Maybe it was a nonfunctional display phone. Either way, they had a potential customer walk in that couldn’t evaluate their merchandise. I would have said something to customer service, but they weren’t around. There were no reps in the front of the store. So I left.

Not Ready Not Now
In addition to not wanting you to evaluate the product in store, Sprint is no longer allowing customers to order the Pre over the phone. (This is a phone company.) You can’t buy online, either. How unreal. Why be in business? Oh, and Palm should be pissed.

Is it any wonder Sprint is tanking so fast?

Update: In late July Sprint began offering the Palm Pre for sale through its website.


AT&T Coverage Still Stinks

June 10th, 2009 | 9:17 pm cdt

About 9 months ago I wrote about the terrible AT&T coverage at my house. In that time nothing has changed and tonight I finally decided to contact them about it. My first step was going to be email, then escalate to phone calls when the email yields a canned response.

Well, I can’t even email them. Logging into my account this evening is impossible. It’s one error message after another as these screens show:

AT∓T Loading...

AT∓T Gateway Timeout

AT∓T Functionality Unavailable

At one point I was logged in for about 2 minutes. When I clicked the contact link, the resulting page informed me my session had timed out.

Continued Reception Woes
This is the coverage map. Looks like I’m stuck between two towers.

AT∓T coverage Map

According to AT&T I’m in the GOOD area.

GOOD: The areas shown in the medium orange should be sufficient for on-street or in-the-open coverage, most in-vehicle coverage and possibly some in-building coverage.

SOME in-building coverage. At my house, ‘Some’ equals about 1 bar on the EDGE network. 1 bar on EDGE equals no data connection. It also means missed calls and dropped calls. ‘Some’ times it means no service. It always means no 3G, even though the map says the opposite.

AT∓T 1 bar EDGE

AT∓T No Service

If I can ever contact AT&T, I want them to know that coverage in this area stinks. Ideally they have a database of people who have complained about coverage in this area and it’s only going to take one more (my) complaint for them to come out to the tower and boost the signal, build a new tower, whatever. 13 more months to go…


The AT&T Dilemma

July 24th, 2008 | 11:38 pm cdt

My contract for cell service with Sprint has been up since May. Perfect timing for a July iPhone launch, but I’m still undecided.

The iPhone is an excellent device, but is it worth the potential pain of signing up with AT&T?

A buddy of mine was telling me about the ordeal with his iPhone purchase. He’s been an AT&T customer prior to Cingular when they were AT&T once before. So apparently he had a nice credit due to him the next time he bought a new phone. Long story short, the credit was good for anything but an iPhone. Five conversations with five AT&T customer service supervisors wouldn’t get him the credit. He wondered why new AT&T customers should be able to pay $200 for a new iPhone while faithful, long-standing AT&T customers should have to pay more.

Seems a valid enough concern.

(In this situation an Apple Store employee stepped up, providing the credit, putting his job at risk for doing so.)

Feels more and more that most behemoth companies like AT&T tend to place little value on existing customers. We see similar stories with Comcast.

Is the fact that there are so many customers of a single company mean these stories are just bound to happen? Are the vast majority of customers happy and content?

I’ve been a Sprint customer since 2002. I never had an issue except for a $40 activation fee that showed up 5 months after activation. I called and spoke to 2 different people about it. They refused to do anything. What could I do? It would be a $150 fee if I decided to no longer do business with them. I know it could always be worse.

Regardless, they seem to win no matter what.

So what is one to do? You want the nice device, but how can you avoid the undesirable service provider? How can you send a message? Wait 4 more years when Apple will be out from under their contract with AT&T? As if both companies won’t have already made the pile of cash they expect?

How many people would have to boycott a company as large as AT&T before things changed? What should change? Do people have the willpower to carry out something that massive, especially against a product like the iPhone?

Such is the AT&T dilemma.


Sprint Still Sucks

January 24th, 2007 | 12:54 pm cdt

Sprint has a special running on their website where you can add a line to your plan for $9.99 and choose between two free phones. Merredith and I want to be on the same plan, so I call Sprint to run through the options over the phone. This way I can ask them a bunch of questions, mainly making sure they don’t charge me a random activation/upgrade fee 4 or 5 months down the line again.

So I talk to the rep on the phone and get everything squared away when all of a sudden I’m informed that they can’t offer me that deal with that particular phone over the phone. “It’s not a tele-sales promotion.” I’ll have to process the order over the web. What?? I ask again, “You can’t process this for me over the phone?” “No,” they respond, “That must be done online. We can’t help you.”

What kind of customer service is this? This is the most asinine requirement. I bet if the CEO or anyone else above middle-management knew this was going on, this would never be happening. I’ve called two different reps and both have said the same thing. That’s twice I’ve called Sprint, willing to give them money for a service, and they’ve denied me because the reps can’t process the order over the phone. Unbelievable.


Sprint Sucks Afterall

September 26th, 2006 | 12:03 am cdt

I bought and activated a new phone from Sprint back in May. This week, nearly 5 months later, I received my monthly bill that contained an $18 phone upgrade activation fee. A mistake? Oh no. Two customer service representatives assured me that it takes this long for activation fees to show up on billing statements.

It’s a shame this happened, because up until now I had zero issues with Sprint for the past 4 years.

Update: Oh, and Sprint is raising their data usage rates from $0.002 per KB to $0.03 per KB. But surely this has to be a typo. That means the 4,035 KB that I used last month that cost $8.07 at $0.002 per KB would now be $121.05 at $0.03 per KB. Surely, surely this is a typo. $121 for 4,035 KBs of usage would be insane.


Projects

Candor Gallery
Candor Gallery
Candor Gallery is an OS X Widget and Google Gadget that displays user submitted art.
Tweeting Litter Box Cam
Litter Cam
Big Fat Molly Cat Live streaming litter cam with Twitter motion alerts.
Tennessee Traffic Cams
Tennessee Traffic Cams
Tennessee Traffic Cams is a widget that displays traffic camera feeds from across the state of Tennessee.
Language Design Group
Language Design Group
Language Design Group is a translation agency for all your foreign language needs.
Portfolio
Portfolio
My personal portfolio
Older Projects
Crissy's Roommate
PenceBook
Crissy's Roommate was a daily cartoon strip produced for the Daily Beacon from 2000-2002.
Hess Hall Webcam
Hess Hall Webcam
The Hess Hall Webcam captured the daily activities of Hess Hall.
Etc.
Browser Dream

The Ubuntu Counter Project - user number # 783